1. Home
  2. Indicators for assessing the impact of science, technology, innovation on the achievement of the SDGs

Indicators for assessing the impact of science, technology, innovation on the achievement of the SDGs

  Upload file

 

http://doi.org/10.35668/978-966-479-148-6

Indicators for assessing the impact of science, technology, innovation on the achievement of the SDGs: collective monograph / T.V. Pysarenko, T.K. Kvasha, S.V. Marynina et al. – Kyiv: UkrISTEI, 2024. – P. 150.

UDC [330.341.1+001.895]

ISBN 978-966-479-148-6

Pysarenko T. V. — PhD in Engineering, Deputy Director of State Institution “Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information”, 180, Antonovycha Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; +38 (096) 376-38-14; tvpisarenko@gmail.com; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9806-2872

Marynina S. V. – PhD in Economics, Head of the Department, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; +380636438687; E-mail: smaryn@meta.ua; ORCID: 0000-0002-0554-1602

Kvasha T. K. – Head of the Department, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; (044) 5210074; E-mail: ntatyana@ukr.net; kvasha@uintei.kiev.ua; ORCID:  http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-3531

Musina L. A. – PhD in Economics, leading researcher, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; +38 (050) 351-08-84; musina@ukr.net; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7706-3451

Rozhkova L. V. – Head of the Sector, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; (044) 5210967; E-mail: liliya_rozhkova@ukr.net; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8002-3461

Bohomazova V. V. – PhD in Economics, leading researcher, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha Str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; (044) 5210080, Е-mail: verbog@ukr.net; ORCID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8756-3871

Paladchenko O. F. – Head of the Sector, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; (044) 5210080; E-mail: epalada@ukr.net; paladchenko@uintei.kiev.ua; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-1608

Molchanova I. V. – Senior Research Associate, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; +38 (044) 5210080; E-mail: molchanova_irina@ukr.net; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-5621

Kovalenko O. I. – PhD in Economics, Senior Research Associate, Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information, 180, Antonovycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150; +38 (044) 5210080; E-mail: helen.smithua@gmail.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4427-1564

Abstract. The monograph outlines the theoretical foundations for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the course of this study, the approaches used by international organizations and the European Union to measure the impact of science, technology and innovation (STI) on the achievement of the SDGs were reviewed and analyzed. In particular, the paper presents the results of a study on the methods and indicators used by Eurostat, the European Commission, the European Urban Initiative, UNESCO, UNIDO, UNCTAD and WHO.
The sixth stage of the STI Roadmap for the SDGs for Ukraine was finalized, which, with the exception of the sixth stage, was developed in 2023 and approved by the Board of the Ministry of Education and Science. This stage includes both monitoring the status of implementation of the Roadmap actions proposed by the central executive authorities and assessing the impact of STI on the SDGs.
Using the experience of applying indicators for measuring the contribution of STI to the SDGs, the “Ukrainian Institute of Scientific and Technical Expertise and Information” developed methodological recommendations for assessing the impact of STI on the SDGs in Ukraine. These methodological recommendations introduce a differentiated approach to assessing the impact of STI separately for six missions corresponding to the priority areas of development of scientific, technical and innovation activities.
This allows for a more thorough analysis of the results of the state policy on technological, environmental and social innovations, bringing together different groups of stakeholders, types of economic activity and fields of science to address the urgent socio-economic problems set out in SDG target 17 in a coordinated manner, and, thanks to these changes, more actively influencing the effectiveness of the national policy on achieving the SDGs.
Designed for representatives of government bodies, experts, researchers, higher education teachers.

Keywords: indicators, Sustainable Development Goals, innovation, technology, monitoring, influence, roadmap.

REFERENCES

  1. Dorozhnia karta vykorystannia nauky, tekhnolohii, innovatsii dlia dosiahnennia Tsilei staloho rozvytku [A roadmap for using science, technology and innovation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals]: kolekt. monohrafiia / T.V. Pysarenko, T.K. Kvasha, L.A. Musina ta in. – K.: UkrINTEI, 2023. – 391 p. Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.35668/978-966-479-135-6 [in Ukr.].
  2. Dorozhnia karta vykorystannia nauky, tekhnolohii, innovatsii dlia dosiahnennia tsilei staloho rozvytku. [A roadmap for using science, technology and innovation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals]. Ukhvaleno kolehiieiu Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy protokol vid 22.12.2023 № 3. Retrieved from: https://mon.gov.ua/static-objects/mon/sites/1/news/2024/01/03/Dorozhnya.karta.vykoryst.nauky.tekhnolohiy.ta.innovatsiy-03.01.2024-1.1.pdf [in Ukr.].
  3. (2020) Industrial Development Report 2020. Industrializing in the Digital Age. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/resources-publications-flagship-publications-indus...
  4. (2022). Industrial Development Report 2022: The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/idr2022
  5. (2023) Industrial Development Report 2024. Turning challenges into sustainable solutions. The New Era of Industrial Policy. Overview. UNIDO, Vienna, November 2023. Retrieved from: https://unido.org
  6. Aiginger, K. and Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), pp. 189–207. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3
  7. The Future of Growth Report 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-growth-report/
  8. The European Green Deal. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c...
  9. A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0102
  10. Horizon Europe. Retrieved from: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportuniti...
  11. Rainer Kattel & Mariana Mazzucato (2018). "Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector, Industrial and Corporate Change", Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 787-801. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329760387_Mission-oriented_inno...
  12. Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. (2012), ‘Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change’, Research Policy, Vol. 41(6), pp. 1037-1047
  13. (2021) United Nations Inter-Agency Task Team, S.T.A.I.F.S. & European Commission, J.R.C., Guidebook for the Preparation of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) for SDGs Roadmaps, EUR 30606 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/documents/guidebook-preparation-sti-sdgs-roadmaps-en...
  14. (2023) European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Barberis Rami, M., Reid, A., Rantcheva, A., et al., R&I contribution to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), elaboration of specific topics: final report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. Retrieved from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/224833
  15. (2018) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Eurostat, 2018. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris: OECD- Eurostat. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/science/oslo-manual-2018-9789264304604-en.htm
  16. (2022) European Commission 2022. R&I contribution to the achievement of the SDGs, elaboration of specific topics - doi: 10.2777/224833 KI-03-23-021-EN-N
  17. Eichier G.M., Schwartz E.J. (2019). What Sustainable Development Goals do social innovation address? A Systematic Review and content analyses of Social Innovation literature, Sustainability 11, 522-534. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/522
  18. Sianes A., Vega-Muñoz A., Tirado-Valencia P., Ariza-Montes A. (2022). Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals on the academic research agenda. A scientometric analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0265409.
  19. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J.B. (1972). The limits to growth, A Report for the club of Rome’ Project on the Predicament of Mankind (Universe Book, New York, 1972).
  20. Pieterse J.N. (2001). Development theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions. SAGE publications, California, 195 р.
  21. André Berger (1988). Milankovitch Theory and Climate. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230890888_Milankovitch_Theory_a...
  22.  Milankovitch (Orbital) Cycles and Their Role in Earth’s Climate. Retrieved from: https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/milankovitch-orb...
  23. Theory and Concepts of Climate Change and Cities. Retrieved from: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/Module%...
  24. Sidiropoulos Michael (2023). Ten Theories of Climate Change. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375161345_TEN_THEORIES_OF_CLIMA...
  25. Svensmark, Henrik (2007). Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/48/1/1.18/220765
  26. Remigijus Ciegis. The Concept of Sustainable Development and its Use for Sustainability Scenarios. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228639830_The_Concept_of_Sustai...
  27. Solow R. M. (1993). An Almost Practical Step towards Sustainability. Resources Policy (19), pp. 162-172.
  28. Hicks J. (1946) Value and Capital. Oxford, UK.
  29. Ciegis R., Jasinskas E. (2005). Concepts of Strong Comparability and Commensurability Versus Concepts of Strong and Weak Sustainability. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering economics. pp. 31-35.
  30. Holling C.S. (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, pp. 1-23.
  31. Common M., & Perrings C. (1992). Towards an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecological Economics, pp. 7-34. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/092180099290036R
  32. Chambers R. (1989). Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), pp. 1-7. Retrieved from: https://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/index.php/idsbo/%20article/view/1821
  33. Helm D. (1998). The assessment: environmental policy – objectives, instruments and institutions. Oxford review policy, 14(4). Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v14y1998i4p1-19.html
  34. Pigou A. (1920). The economics of welfare. London, England: Macmillan.
  35. Dixon J. A., Fallon L. A. (1989). The concept of sustainability: Origins, extensions, and usefulness for policy. Society & Natural Resources, 2(1), pp. 73–84. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941928909380675
  36. Eblen R.A., Eblen W.R. (1994). Encyclopedia of the environment. Houghton: Mifflin Co.
  37. Paxton L. Enviro (1993). Facts 3: Sustainable development. Howick, South Africa: Environmental Education Association of Southern Africa.
  38. Mensah J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Cogent-Social-Sciences-2331-1886/pu...
  39. (1987) Our Common Future. World Commision on Environment and Development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-f...
  40. Emas R. The Concept of Sustainable Development: Definition and Defining Principles. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339003550_The_Concept_of_Sustai...
  41. (1991). IUCN, UNEP, WWF. Caring for the Earth. A strategy for sustainable living. London: Earthscan.
  42. (1992) Declaration on Environment and Development. Retrieved from: https://www.bnpparibas.com/en/sustainable-development/text/Rio-Declarati... .
  43. Díaz-López C., Martín-Blanco C., De La J.J., Bayo T., Rubio-Rivera B., Zamorano M., Blanco M., De La C., Rubio-Rivera J.J., Zamorano B., et al. (2021). Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of the Sustainable Development Goals. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8286. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8286
  44. (2021) European Commission. SWD/2021/305: Better Regulation Guidelines. 2021. Available online: Better regulation guidelines | European Commission (europa.eu) (accessed on 14.03.2024). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/the-eu-agenda-for-bet...
  45. Kostetckaia M.; Hametner M. (2022). How Sustainable Development Goals interlinkages influence European Union countries’ progress towards the 2030 Agenda. Sustain. De v. 2022, 30, pp. 916–926. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357929056_How_Sustainable_Devel...'_progress_towards_the_2030_Agenda
  46. Kothary U., Minogue M. (2001). Development theory and practice, Critical Perspectives. (Palgrave, London, 2001) Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000199905
  47. Greig A., Hume D., Turner M. (2007). Challenging Global inequality: development theory and practice in 21-th century. (Palgrave, London, 2007) Retrieved from: https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/challenging-glo...
  48. Agarwal N., Kwan P., Paul D. (2018) Merger and acquisition pricing using agent-based modelling, Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 13, pp. 84–99. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329282256_Merger_and_acquisitio...
  49. Barbier E.B., Burgess J.C. (2019) Sustainable Development Goals indicators: analyzing trade-offs and complementarities, World development 122, pp. 295-305. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X19301482
  50. Miola A., Schiltz F. (2019) Measuring Sustainable Development Goals Performance: How to monitor policy action in the 2030 agenda implementation, Ecological economics, P. 164. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334083487_Measuring_sustainable...
  51. Biggery M., Clark D.A., Ferrannini A., Mauro V. (2019) Tracking the Sustainable Development Goals in an “Integrated’ manner: a proposal for a new index to capture synergies and trade-offs between and within goals, World development, 122, pp. 628-647.
  52. Marynovska O.Ia. (2012) Sutnist poniattia “monitorynh” u pedahohichnykh doslidzhenniakh [The essence of the concept of ‘monitoring’ in pedagogical research] / O.Ia. Marynovska // Pedahohichnyi almanakh : zb. nauk. pr./ redkol. V.V. Kuzmenko (holova) ta in. – Kherson: RIPO. Vyp. 15 [In Ukr].
  53. Aistrakhanov D.D. (2003) Kontseptualni osnovy statystychnoho monitorynhu [Conceptual framework for statistical monitoring] / D.D.Aistrakhanov, M.V. Puhachova, V.S. Stepashko ta in.; Za red. M.V. Puhachovoi. – K.: Inform. - vyd. tsentr Derzhkomstatu Ukrainy. – 436 p. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andriy-Olenko/publication/249657516...
  54. Gusmão Caiado R.G., Leal Filho W., Quelhas O.L.G., Luiz de Mattos Nascimento D., Ávila L.V. (2018) A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, pp. 1276-1288. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326335759_A_Literature-Based_Re...
  55. Biglari S., Beiglary S., Arthanari T. (2022) Achieving sustainable development goals: Fact or Fiction? J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 332, 130032 Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356927260_Achieving_sustainable...
  56. Miola A., Borchardt S., Neher F., Buscaglia D. (2019) Interlinkages and Policy Coherence for the Sustainable Development Goals Implementation: An Operational Method to Identify Trade-Offs and Co-Benefits in a Systemic Way; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330713680_Interlinkages_and_pol...
  57. Pradhan P., Costa L., Rybski D., Lucht W., Kropp J.P. (2017) A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth’s Futur. 2017, 5, 1169–1179. Retrieved from: A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions - Pradhan - 2017 - Earth's Future - Wiley Online Library
  58. The state of play and prospects for measuring innovation in the public sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance № 67. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/dca76af0-en.pdf?expires=17102447...
  59. Stoianovskyi A.R. (2010) Osoblyvosti pobudovy ta perspektyvy rozvytku zahalnoderzhavnoi systemy monitorynhu innovatsiinoi diialnosti v Ukraini [Peculiarities of Building and Prospects for the Development of a National System for Monitoring Innovation Activities in Ukraine] / A.R. Stoianovskyi // Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. — № 4. — T. 1. — p. 283—289. [In Ukr]. Retrieved from: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/2010_4_1/282-289.pdf
  60. Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Roadmaps for the SDGs. A Guide for design and implementation. Retrieved from: https://www.inno4sd.net/uploads/originals/1/inno4sd-pub-mgd-01-2019-fnl-...
  61. (2017) Sustainable development in the European Union MONITORING REPORT ON PROGRESS TOWARDS THE SDGS IN AN EU CONTEXT 2017 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. -  doi:10.2785/237722.
  62. (2020) EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels, 3.3.2010 COM (2010) 2020. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN...
  63. Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Bermont Diaz, L., Kloke-Lesch, A., Koundouri, P., Riccaboni, A. (2022) Achieving the SDGs: Europe’s Compass in a Multipolar World. Europe Sustainable Development Report 2022. SDSN and SDSN Europe. France: Paris. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/2235.html
  64. (2023) Sustainable development in the European Union Statistical annex to the EU voluntary review 2023 edition.  Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. doi:10.2785/97840 KS-05-23-188-EN-N. – p. 4.
  65. (2023) R&I contribution to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), elaboration of specific topics. Final Report. European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023. - doi: 10.2777/224833 KI-03-23-021-EN-N.
  66. (2023) Measuring R&I contribution to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Michela Bello та інші. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2023 - doi:10.2760/999096 KJ-NA-31-533-EN-N
  67. (2024) Making Innovation Policy Work for Development: World Intellectual Property Report 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/world-intellectual-property-report...
  68. Sustainable Development Goal 2. FAO. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3a8baf8c-960d-4...
  69. (2024) Measuring the impacts of climate change on the rural poor, women and youth: Summary. Rome: FAO. 16 p. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/cc9638en/cc9638en.pdf
  70. Conforti, P., Markova, G., & Tochkov, D. (2020) FAO’s methodology for damage and loss assessment in agriculture. FAO Statistics Working Paper 19-17. Rome. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca6990en
  71. (2023) Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2023. Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/b14de474-en
  72. (2022) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, International Agricultural Productivity Database. Retrieved from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-produc...
  73. International Agricultural Productivity: Documentation and Methods. Retrieved from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-produc...
  74. (2023) Agri-environmental Indicators. OECD. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/agri-environmentalindica....
  75. IEA World Energy Statistics and Balances. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00512-en
  76. (2022) UNFCCC greenhouse gas inventory database. Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int
  77. OECD Environment Statistics. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00602-en.
  78. R&I contribution to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), elaboration of specific topics. Retrieved from: https://op.europa.eu/fr/publication-detail/-/publication/13b40ceb-96e4-1...
  79. (2021) Science for the Sustainable Development Goals: SDG 2 : Zero Hunger. UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT – POLICY BRIEF ON SDG2. 2021. 13 р. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384307
  80. Malabo Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation for Shared Prosperity and Improved Livelihoods. Retrieved from: https://www.resakss.org/sites/default/files/Malabo%20Declaration%20on%20...
  81. (1999) Sock Chung Charles Synder. ERP Initiation - A Historical Perspective. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301353341.pdf
  82. (2000) Kim Davenport Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It/ DOI:10.1177/000765030003900205
  83. (2005) Kim, Yongbeom; Lee, Zoonky; Gosain, Sanjay. Business Process Management Journal; Bradford Том 11, Вид.2, (2005): 158-170. DOI:10.1108/14637150510591156
  84. Stefanou, C.J. (2017) A Framework for the Ex-ante Evaluation of ERP Software. European Journal of Information Systems, 10 (4), 595-621. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000407
  85. Ochiel J.W. (2019). Technical and Scale Efficiency of Hospitals in Kisumu County Kenya. University of Nairobi; 2019. Retrieved from: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/154950
  86. Adang E.M., Borm G.F. (2007). Is there an association between economic performance and public satisfaction in health care? Eur. J. Health Econ. 2007; 8: 279–285. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-007-0045-6
  87. Kim Y, Oh D h, Kang M (2016). Productivity changes in OECD healthcare systems: bias-corrected Malmquist productivity approach. Int. J. Health Plann. Manag. 2016; 31(4): 537–553. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.2333
  88. Hsu Y-C (2014). Efficiency in government health spending: a super slacks-based model. Qual. Quant. 2014; 48(1): 111–126. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-012-9753-9
  89. Grausová M, Hužvár M, Štrangfeldová J (2014). Healthcare systems efficiency in the Visegrád group. Applications of Mathematics and Statistics in Economics. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269161118_Healthcare_Systems_Ef...
  90. Kirigia J.M., Asbu E.Z., Greene W, et al. (2007). Technical efficiency, efficiency change, technical progress and productivity growth in the national health systems of continental African countries. East. Afr. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev. 2007; 23(2): 19–40. Retrieved from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/219474
  91. Masri M.D., Asbu E.Z. (2018) Productivity change of national health systems in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: application of DEA-based Malmquist productivity index. Global Health Research and Policy. 2018; 3(1): 1–13. Retrieved from: https://ghrp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41256-018-0077-8
  92. Singh S, Bala MM, Kumar N, et al. (2021). Application of DEA-Based malmquist productivity index on health care system efficiency of ASEAN countries. Int. J. Health Plann. Manag. 2021; 36(4): 1236–1250. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350877999_Application_of_DEA-Ba...
  93. Almessabi B.N. (2020). A nexus between cost efficiency and cost productivity: a case study of health systems of developed countries. PalArch's J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol. 2020; 17(7): 15849–15861. Retrieved from: https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/6324
  94. Ibrahim M.D., Daneshvar S., Hocaoğlu M.B., et al. (2019). An estimation of the efficiency and productivity of healthcare systems in sub-Saharan Africa: health-centred millennium development goal-based evidence. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019; 143: 371–389.
  95. Wagner JM, Shimshak DG: Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377221706002839?...
  96. A Review of Current Approaches to Defining and Valuing Innovation in Health Technology Assessment. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301521015941
  97. (2024) Impact of research on society and economy: the digital health revolution in healthcare. Clarivate. Retrieved from: https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2024/06/ISI-GRR-202...
  98. Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics 109, 1477–1495. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y
  99. Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. (2017). Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? Scientometrics 110, 937–943. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2
  100. Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. (2017) How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data. Scientometrics 110, 1209–1216. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2237-2
  101. Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. (2019) Societal Impact Measurement of Research Papers. In: Glänzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch, U., Thelwall, M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_23
  102. Martin Szomszor, Euan Adie; Overton (2022). A bibliometric database of policy document citations. Quantitative Science Studies 2022; 3 (3): 624–650. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00204
  103. Yu, H., Murat, B., Li, J. et al. (2023) How can policy document mentions to scholarly papers be interpreted? An analysis of the underlying mentioning process. Scientometrics 128, 6247–6266. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04826-y
  104. (2018) Effectively harnessing science, technology and innovation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ciimem4d17_en.pdf
  105.  Jonathan Cylus, Irene Papanicolas и Peter C. Smith. (2018). Health system performance: ways to raise the profile of quantification as a tool for managers and policy makers. Retrieved from: https://who-sandbox.squiz.cloud/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/391433/Healt...
  106. Tam T.Y., Smith M.D. (2008) Pharmacoeconomic guidelines around the world. ISPOR CONNECTIONS, 10:4–5. Retrieved from: https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/more-heor-resources/pharmacoeconomi...
  107. Weinstein M.C., Torrance G, McGuire A. (2009) QALYs: the basics. Value in Health, 12 (Suppl. 1): S5–S9. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x
  108. (2013) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013. London, NICE. Retrieved from: https://www.nice. org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/1-foreword
  109. (2014) NICE International, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The Gates Reference Case: what it is, why it’s important and how to use it. NICE International. Retrieved from: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/ About/what-we-do/NICE-International/projects/Gates-Reference-case-what-it-is-how-to-use-it. pdf
  110. Cookson R, Culyer A. (2010) Measuring overall population health: the use and abuse of QALYs. In: Killoran A, Kelly MP, eds. Evidence-based public health: effectiveness and efficiency. Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563623.003.010
  111. Williams A. (1995) The measurement and valuation of health: a chronicle. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Paper. York, University of York. Retrieved from: http://www.york.ac.uk/che/pdf/DP136.pdf
  112. (2008) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Social value judgements: principles for the development of NICE guidance. London, NICE. Retrieved from: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/about/what-we-do/research-and-deve...
  113. (2011) Health technology assessment of medical devices. WHO Medical device technical series. Geneva, WHO. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501361
  114. (2010) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Measuring effectiveness and cost effectiveness: the QALY. London, NICE.
  115. Sauvage P. (2008) Pharmaceutical pricing in France: a critique. Eurohealth, 14(2):6–8. Retrieved from: http://apps.who.int/ medicinedocs/documents/s20974en/s20974en.pdf
  116. (2009) Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). General methods for the assessment of the relation of benefits to costs. Cologne, IQWiG. Retrieved from: http://www.ispor.org/peguidelines/source/Germany_AssessmentoftheRelation...
  117. Bulfone L, Younie S, Carter R. (2009) Health technology assessment: reflections from the Antipodes. Value in Health, 12(Suppl. 2): S28–S38. Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19523182/
  118. Wilsdon T, Serota A. (2011) A comparative role and impact of health technology assessment. London, Charles River Associates. Retrieved from: https://efpia.eu/media/25695/a-comparative-analysis-of-the-role-and-impa...
  119. Garrido M.V. (2008). Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe: current status, challenges and potential. Observatory Studies Series No 14. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Retrieved from: http://www. euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/90426/E91922.pdf
  120. Beresniak A et al. (2013). Final report summary: ECHOUTCOME (European Consortium in Healthcare Outcomes and Cost–Benefit Research). Retrieved from: http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/57938_en.html
  121. (2013) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Centre for Health Technology Evaluation. Consultation Paper: Value Based Assessment for Health Technologies. London, NICE. Retrieved from: https://www. nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/NICE-guidance/NICE-technology-appraisals/VBA-TAMethods-Guide-for-Consultation.pdf
  122. Musoke E, Lule Yawe B and Ddumba Ssentamu J. (2023) The total factor productivity growth of health systems in African least developed countries. F1000Research 2023, 12:1050 Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.135418.1
  123. (2021) World Bank: The World Bank. DataBank. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank; 2021. Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  124. World Health Organization: Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicators-index
  125.  Cetin V.R., Bahce S. (2016). Measuring the efficiency of health systems of OECD countries by data envelopment analysis. Appl. Econ. 2016; 48(37):3497–3507. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1139682
  126. Hulten C.R. (1986). Productivity change, capacity utilization, and the sources of efficiency growth. J. Econ. 1986; 33(1-2): 31–50. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90026-6
  127. Ojwang’Oyieke S, Karamagi IJ (2023). Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Referral Hospitals in Kenya: 2012-2016. Tanzanian Economic Review. 2023; 12(2).
  128. Al-Hanawi, M.K., Makuta, I.F. (2022)  Changes in productivity in healthcare services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 20, 3 (2022). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00338-3
  129. SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation: UNESCO SCIENCE REPORT. The race against time for smarter development. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377433
  130. (2022) The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022_Russian.pdf. Retrieved from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goal...
  131. (2024) Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2024. Retrieved from: https://trackingsdg7.esmap.org/data/files/download-documents/SDG7%20-%20...
  132. Science for the Sustainable Development Goals, SDG 7: affordable and clean energy. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384311
  133. The 2021 Global Energy Innovation Index: National Contributions to the Global Clean Energy Innovation System. Retrieved from: https://www2.itif.org/2021-global-energy-innovation-index.pdf
  134. (2019) Productivity & Innovation Competencies in the Midst of the Digital Transformation Age: A EU-US Comparison. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 - doi:10.2765/106835. Retrieved from: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-10/dp119_en.pdf
  135. UN indicators for SDGs. Retrieved from: https://www.businessfor2030.org/metrics-indicators
  136. (2021) UNESCO Science Report: The race against time for smarter development. Retrieved from: https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021/en/download-report
  137. Launch of the 2024 Survey of Research and Development (R&D) Statistics for SDG 9.5. Retrieved from: https://uis.unesco.org/en/news/launch-2024-survey-research-development-s...
  138. SDG 9: Industry, innovation & infrastructure. Retrieved from: https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021/sites/default/files/medias/f...
  139. European Urban Initiative. Retrieved from: https://www.urban-initiative.eu/technology-cities
  140. European Urban initiative. Technology in cities Retrieved from: https://www.urban-initiative.eu/technology-cities
  141. European Commission. Eco-Innovation at the heart of European policies. Retrieved from: https://green-business.ec.europa.eu/eco-innovation_en
  142. European Commission. European Innovation Scorebord 2023. Methodology Report / Hugo Hollanders. Retrieved from: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/e59de361-...
  143. Science for the Sustainable Development Goals, SDG 13: climate change. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384313 
  144. Science for the Sustainable Development Goals, SDG 14: life below water. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384314 
  145. Science for the Sustainable Development Goals, SDG 15: life on land. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384306
English

 

  • Національна академія педагогічних наук України
  •   
  • DB «Technologies of Ukraine»
  • DB "Research, developmental works and dissertations of Ukraine"
  • DB «Innovative technologies and developments»
  • DB «Scientific periodicals of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine»
  • DB «Scientific and technical events»